Licensing a blog
For my blog, I would opt for an Attribution
– Share Alike licence.
·
I don’t seek commercial gain
from my blog, so the issue of whether or not to have a ‘NonCommercial’ licence
doesn’t apply.
·
I’d like anything I blog to be
disseminated as widely as possible. If I put on a ‘NonCommercial’ licence, then
some bloggers who use advertisements on their blogs to generate income wouldn’t
be able to use my blog – and I want people like that to be able to use it.
·
I’d like people to be able to
amend/evolve/make derivatives of anything I produce as much as they like – I
think seeing how something you create can be taken by others and reinterpreted
would be great.
Thinking about this in the
context of my blog is straightforward, as I don’t really see my blog posts as
having much commercial value so it’s easy to just want to be as free as open as
possible.
Licensing learning materials that I create
If I think instead about teaching materials
that I might create and put online – materials that could be used in a
commercial, fee-earning course by other people or corporations – then the question
becomes more interesting, as issues of potential ‘lost income’ arise.
I think I would still stay with an
Attribution – Share Alike licence, but my reasons would be a bit different: -
·
I’d still like anything I
create to be disseminated as widely as possible.
·
My focus, English Language
Teaching, has a sufficiently big worldwide market that I think we can all just
pitch in and try and spread as many good materials as we can to as many people –
it won’t dent our own markets really.
·
I think ‘content’ across many
subject disciplines will become a commodity anyway – there isn’t much point
trying to ringfence it and charge a rent for it. The value-add will come in
other ways – how content is delivered, how different organisations use content
to advance effective learning.
·
I value being able to use other
people’s learning materials when I teach – so I like the reciprocative
principle that people can use my materials in return.
·
I also like the idea that
others will enhance what I do – I’m very unlikely to come up with anything that
can’t be improved and enhanced if I allow others to work on it.
·
From a practical point of view,
I don’t think I could enforce compliance over intellectual property rights
anyway.
The idea that whatever we release could be improved is not trivial. I read this previously and I've come back to comment after seeing an example of this. This week I handed over to a fellow tutor a lesson I had designed and then saw her deliver it with her improvements a few days later. I learnt more from this process than I might have expected...
ReplyDelete