[Activity 10, H817 MOOC]
|
|
Is the
sustainability model apparent?
|
Did Wiley cover all
approaches, or do you think a different model is operating?
|
|
Change MOOC
|
Not really – seems
like a personal site curated by Cornier, Siemens and Downes
|
I guess this is closest
to the Rice Model – not linked to a specific institution, and looks like
services are provided voluntarily.
|
|
Coursera
|
Not very apparent.
It looks slick and commercial, and the links take you to ‘founders’ who are
venture capitalists. It describes itself as a social enterprise, so it is
profit-making, albeit maybe not profit-maximising.
|
This is a different
model, Wiley has not covered it. I guess it is seeded by the venture
capitalists, and probably has some different revenue streams. One that is
apparent is the ‘signature track’, where you can pay to have your learning
accredited and certified. I would guess the universities involved may pay a
fee to Coursera to be on the platform, as this is good marketing for them –
but this is not apparent.
|
|
Jorum
|
Quite apparent – the
‘about us’ section has a lot of the history of Jorum, explaining that it is a
JISC-funded collaborative venture.
|
Probably closest to
the USU Model – a hybrid of centralisation and decentralisation. It isn’t
clear whether all the work is done by paid staff or if volunteers are also
involved.
|
|
OpenLearn
|
Reasonably apparent,
not as apparent as Jorum though.
|
Probably closest to
the MIT model. OpenLearn is centralised, focuses on the materials of just one
institution, and (from memory) was given foundation funding to get it
established.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment